|
ot |
 |
open_theo |
o |
| o |
ot
John Haught: "God, Evolution and the Promise of Nature"
John Haught, from
Georgetown University, brought us a different angle from which to view
creation than Kenneth R. Miller from Brown did yesterday, but very much
a complementary one.
Here
goes…
The
universe is estimated to be about 13.7 billion years old.
Think
of it as a library. There are 30 volumes; each volume is 450 pages.
Each page represents 1 million years. Using this analogy, the Earth
began in volume 21; the Cambrian explosion in volume 29. Dinosaurs are
extinct in volume 30 page 385, and modern humans appear in volume 30 on
page 450, the last page.
Layer
Explanation:
If
someone asked you why a pot of water was boiling, you could give her
many answers:
1. because of physics
2. because I turned the gas on
3. or because I wanted tea
None
of these answers cancels out the other, instead the compliment each
other. The same can be said for scientific and religious explanations
for events.
Evolution:
In
order to understand evolution, there has to be a modification of the
understanding of God.
Evolution’s
recipe: contingency + natural selection + lots and lots of time
In
Haught’s view, there are several ways to rectify evolution and religion:
1. “Blind Faith: believe that evolution is correct, but our inability
to meld it easily with Christianity is because of human ignorance.
* Job 38
2. Evolution
as divine pedagogy: evolution is our curriculum in the classroom of life
3. Biblically:
The biblical theme of promise
*Instead of looking for design, which is imperfect, look for promise.
And the world isn’t perfect yet because God’s promises haven’t been
fulfilled.
*Darwin’s recipe is consistent with promise:
-contingency: nature is open to the future
-laws of nature: a universe we can depend on
-deep time: indicative of divine patience (like seen in the work of
Jurgen Moltmann – “Waiting is never disinterested passivity but the
highest form of interest in the other”)
4. Evolution not
divine plan
5. (And Haught’s
favorite) A Christological Approach
In this view,
creation is a result of “self-humbling” on God’s part. An omnipresent
God withdraws and allows a space to open up in which something other
than God can exist… God allows room for otherness. Evolution is the
meandering, experimentation, duration, indeterminacy, unpredictability.
Teilhard
Haught
talked about Pierre
Teilhard de Chardin (who, like Cher and Prince, goes by one name
only: Teilhard).
There’s
a direction to evolution, a tendency toward centeredness. (Like atoms
and cells are centered around the nucleus, vertebrates around the
central nervous system, but also how civilization grouped into
villages, cities, nations, and now seems to be heading toward
globalization, or what Teilhard called “planetization.”)
There’s
an increase in complexity, consciousness, freedom, openness to the
future… essentially the future is evolving as time goes on, and God is
that future.
“The
world rests on the future as it’s sole support” - Teilhard
-Heather Ciras
|
|
|
|
|
|
|