| Eastern Nazarene College Biology Department BI-104L: Introduction to Ecology and Diversity Lab Laboratory Syllabus: Portfolio Guidelines |
![]() |
| Requirements |
Exemplary
(4 points) |
Effective
(3 points) |
Acceptable
(2 point) |
Unsatisfactory
(1 point) |
Your
Score |
| Completeness |
Student
has included all required artifacts in the portfolio |
Student
is missing 1-2 required artifacts |
Student
is missing 3-4 required artifacts |
Students
is missing 5 or more of the required artifacts |
|
| Performance |
Student
work demonstrates an exceptional knowledge of the course material and
the required skills |
Student
work demonstrates a good knowledge of the course material and the
required skills |
Student work demonstrates an average or fair knowledge of the course material and the required skills | Student work demonstrates a poor knowledge of the course material and the required skills | |
| Attractiveness
and Creativity |
Portfolio is well-organized, easy to read, very neat, and demonstrates exceptional creativity | Portfolio is organized, easy to read, neat, and creative | Portfolio is somewhat organized, easy to read, neat, and creative | Portfolio lacks organization, appears to be thrown together, is difficult to read, and is sloppy | |
| Reflections
on Artifacts |
Paragraphs exist for every artifact, and each clearly describes the artifact and how it reveals the student’s capabilities | Paragraphs exist for most artifacts, and each adequately describes the artifact and how it reveals the student’s capabilities; few mistakes | Many paragraphs are missing, or do not explain connection of artifact to student’s capabilities, or are poorly written with many mistakes | Most or all paragraphs are missing; poorly written | |
| Reflective
Essays |
Well written, easy to read, with exceptional assessment of student’s performance in the course, including strengths and weaknesses | Well written, easy to read, with accurate assessment of how the student performed in the course, including strengths and weaknesses | Somewhat well written with a superficial consideration of the student’s performance in the course. | Poorly written, lackluster effort to evaluate the student’s performance in the course, poor understanding of strengths and weaknesses | |
| Spelling
and Grammar |
0-3 spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors in each reflective essay. | 4-6 spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors in each reflective essay. | 7-9 spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors in written work in each reflective essay. | 10 or more spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors in each reflective essay. |
| Course Description |
Course Requirements | Assignments |
| Tentative Schedule |
Grading |
Portfolio Guidelines |
| Course Syllabus |
Environmental
Science Home Page |
Contact
Professor Twining |